Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after.

It is said that children benefit from caring for domestic animals, in ’s technology-focussed world. , not straightforward, and arguments can against the . This essay will discuss the debate, and give a concluding view.

On the one hand, those who support the ownership of pets cite the various benefits that the activity can bring to a child. understanding nutrition, to learning about biology and daily routines.

, food selection and exercise activities contribute to this strand of development, which

to a child’s all-round education. Another argument is thee motional support that children receive from pets, meaning that the child feels more secure and more confident.

By contrast, opponents of this view point out that not all children in a situation where pet keeping is advisable, or even possible. Examples can be in less affluent countries, of

maintaining a pet may be prohibitive. , children in unstable family environments, due to such issues as unemployment or political turbulence. For these families, pets would suffer neglect, meaning that it would be unfair to keep them, or even . , it that not all

young actually want to keep a pet, their interests lie elsewhere. For these youngsters, animal ownership not .

, it seems advisable that the decision to keep a pet on a child’s interest, ability and family circumstances, than on a general view that ‘all children’ have animals. It would appear that this serves the interests of both the children and the pets involved.