Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns, it can encourage a higher level of violence. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
people argue that it may lead to the increase of violence in the society. I
that police should
with guns in terms of ensuring the security of society and the safety of people
Police officers carrying guns and walking around are less likely to encourage the level of violent crimes. To
with, Police officers are responsible for deterring (
) the latent (potential) criminals and taking care of all the citizens’ safety, which could be
guaranteed by gun-carrying action.
people may intend to commit a crime,
there is a higher possibility for them to quit taking action if they are aware of the serious consequence of meeting gun-carrying police. In this regard the level of violent crimes tends to descend, and
the standpoint that police officers carrying guns will encourage the level of violence will not hold water.
, arming police officers
them to safeguard themselves. There is an alarming increase in gun ownership which would increase the potential
police officers of being the victims of gun crime.
, gun-toting police officers may better able to protect themselves.
, the gun
to the policemen
usage, which is
for specific situations and the policemen
take responsibility for this property.
, the violence is not likely to occur when the police force follow the regulations of gun utilization.
, although it is
true that the policemen who carry firearms may emerge violence, I
advocate the legal
of gun of the police to ensure the social security and defend all the citizens and themselves against the culprits.
The gun ownership of policemen is a controversial problem among community